Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42005784›Full record

ArticleCurrent developments in nutrition2026

Evaluation of Organically Versus Synthetically Derived Multivitamin and Mineral Supplementation on Circulatory Concentration in Healthy Humans: A Single-Blinded Randomized Intervention Study.

Rachel Churm, Eimear Sutton, Jason P Pitt, Richard M Bracken

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current developments in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rachel ChurmApplied Sports Technology Exercise and Medicine Research Centre (A-STEM), Faculty of Science and Engineering, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom.
Eimear SuttonBIOVIT Ltd., Tenby, United Kingdom.
Jason P PittApplied Sports Technology Exercise and Medicine Research Centre (A-STEM), Faculty of Science and Engineering, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom.
Richard M BrackenApplied Sports Technology Exercise and Medicine Research Centre (A-STEM), Faculty of Science and Engineering, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Growing consumer interest in organic products has stimulated demand for organically sourced multivitamins and minerals (MVM); however, evidence comparing their efficacy with conventional synthetic formulations is limited. Objectives: This study aims to assess circulatory concentrations of organically sourced (ORG) compared with synthetically produced (SYN) MVM supplements. Methods: Single-blind randomized 30-d intervention, in which healthy adults ( Results: Both ORG and SYN produced comparable changes in circulating micronutrient concentrations across 2-h and 30-d ingestion protocols, with no significant changes between groups for all vitamins and minerals. Over 30-d ingestion resulted in significant within-group changes; elevated biotin concentrations over time ( Conclusion: Organic and synthetic MVM formulations demonstrated similar postingestion circulatory profiles. These findings support the use of organic MVMs as functionally comparable alternatives to SYN supplements, aligning with increasing consumer demand for organic, naturally derived health products.

Indexed as

multivitamin supplementationnutritionorganically sourcedsupplementationsynthetic sourced

Identifiers

PMID42005784
PMCPMC13089159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.