Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42005758›Full record

ArticleEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2010

Scientific Opinion on the assessment of allergenicity of GM plants and microorganisms and derived food and feed.

EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO Panel)

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 457 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
457citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

457 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Safety evaluation of the food enzyme phospholipase AEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Safety evaluation of the food enzyme cellulase from the genetically modifiedEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Safety evaluation of the food enzyme oryzin from the non-genetically modifiedEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

397 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO Panel)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The weight-of-evidence, case-by-case approach is considered the most appropriate way of assessing the allergenicity of genetically modified (GM) food and feed. This scientific opinion discusses various aspects to increase the strength and accuracy of this approach, including the latest developments pertaining to clinical aspects of allergic reactions, structural aspects of GM food and feed and

Indexed as

Allergenicityfeedfoodgenetically modified organismnewly expressed proteinsafetyweight‐of‐evidence approach

Identifiers

PMID42005758
PMCPMC13085199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.