ReviewAJPM focus2026
Characteristics and Effectiveness of Patient Navigation Programs on Colorectal Cancer Screening and Follow-Up Colonoscopy Uptake: A Systematic Review.
Review in AJPM focus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Patient navigation is an evidence-based intervention that can be used to address patient-level barriers and ultimately increase colorectal cancer screening rates. Because implementation can affect the effectiveness of navigation programs, it is important to study the implementation and effectiveness of the programs to inform future work. Methods: The authors conducted a systematic review of English-language academic journal articles published from 2004 through 2023 and covering studies conducted in the U.S. After literature searches in 4 databases, reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts for potential relevance, followed by a full-text review of articles. The authors abstracted data from included articles, including study characteristics, cancer screening and intervention characteristics and outcomes (when provided), and screening outcomes. The authors assessed the quality of included studies using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for Randomized Trials (ROB 2). The approach adhered to the PRISMA recommendations. Results: The authors included 30 studies, and nearly all ( Discussion: Patient navigation can be an effective strategy for improving colorectal cancer screening uptake. Further research is needed to understand implementation outcomes to bolster screening impact, inform resource allocation, promote equitable implementation, and improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.