Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42005730›Full record

ReviewAJPM focus2026

Characteristics and Effectiveness of Patient Navigation Programs on Colorectal Cancer Screening and Follow-Up Colonoscopy Uptake: A Systematic Review.

Meagan Pilar, Sonja Hoover, Jessica Roberson, Madeleine Jones, Sujha Subramanian

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in AJPM focus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Meagan PilarRTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
Sonja HooverImplenomics, Dover, Delaware.
Jessica RobersonImplenomics, Dover, Delaware.
Madeleine JonesRTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
Sujha SubramanianImplenomics, Dover, Delaware.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Patient navigation is an evidence-based intervention that can be used to address patient-level barriers and ultimately increase colorectal cancer screening rates. Because implementation can affect the effectiveness of navigation programs, it is important to study the implementation and effectiveness of the programs to inform future work. Methods: The authors conducted a systematic review of English-language academic journal articles published from 2004 through 2023 and covering studies conducted in the U.S. After literature searches in 4 databases, reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts for potential relevance, followed by a full-text review of articles. The authors abstracted data from included articles, including study characteristics, cancer screening and intervention characteristics and outcomes (when provided), and screening outcomes. The authors assessed the quality of included studies using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for Randomized Trials (ROB 2). The approach adhered to the PRISMA recommendations. Results: The authors included 30 studies, and nearly all ( Discussion: Patient navigation can be an effective strategy for improving colorectal cancer screening uptake. Further research is needed to understand implementation outcomes to bolster screening impact, inform resource allocation, promote equitable implementation, and improve patient outcomes.

Indexed as

colorectal cancerPatient navigationsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID42005730
PMCPMC13090978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.