Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42005726›Full record

ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2026

Dosimetric intercomparison for stereotactic radiotherapy of multiple brain metastases.

Sara Abdollahi, Rachid Boucenna, Cécile Chatelain, Nathan Corradini, Marie Fargier-Voiron, Vincent Fave, Juan Garcia, Sarah Ghandour, Matthias Guckenberger, Martin Härtig and 18 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors.

Sara AbdollahiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsspital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Rachid BoucennaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Hirslanden Clinique Bois-Cerf, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Cécile ChatelainDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Radio Onkologiezentrum Biel Seeland, Biel-Bienne, Switzerland.
Nathan CorradiniDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Clinica Luganese Moncucco, Lugano, Switzerland.
Marie Fargier-VoironDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Clinique de Genolier, Genolier, Switzerland.
Vincent FaveDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Hôpital de La Tour, Meyrin, Switzerland.
Juan GarciaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Atrys Schweiz AG, Liestal, Switzerland.
Sarah GhandourDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Hôpital Riviera-Chablais, Vaud-Valais, Rennaz, Switzerland.
Matthias GuckenbergerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsspital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Martin HärtigDepartment of Radiation Oncology, St. Claraspital AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Tanja HertelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kantonsspital St.Gallen, St.Gallen, Switzerland.
Maud JaccardDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Clinique de Genolier, Genolier, Switzerland.
David JellerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Switzerland.
Stephan KlöckDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Lindenhofspital, Bern, Switzerland.
Krayenbühl JérômeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsspital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Natacha Ruiz LópezDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, Genève, Switzerland.
Peter PemlerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stadtspital Zürich Triemli, Zürich, Switzerland.
Harald PetermannDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsspital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Olivier PisaturoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Hôpital Fribourgeois, Fribourg, Switzerland.
Francesco PupilloMedical Physics Unit, Imaging Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona, Switzerland.
Daniel SchmidhalterDivision of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Christian TataDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Clinique de La Source, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Sheeba ThengumpallilDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Hirslanden Clinique des Grangettes, Chêne-Bougeries, Switzerland.
Sergejs UnterkirhersDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Klinik Hirslonden, Zürich, Switzerland.
Veronique ValletDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Patrick WeberDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Réseau Hospitalier Neuchâtelois, La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland.
Nicolaus AndratschkeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsspital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Stephanie Tanadini-LangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsspital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and purpose: Stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) delivers high doses with submillimeter precision to small targets, requiring accuracy in both dose calculation and delivery. This study aimed to perform a dosimetric intercomparison of SRT accuracy across multiple radiotherapy departments. Materials and methods: The study included 30 SRT plans submitted by 24 hospitals. A head phantom, equipped with Gafchromic EBT3 film and ion chamber inserts, was used for dose measurements. Invited institutions generated SRT treatment plans prescribing 30 Gy in 5 fractions to brain targets, following their clinical protocols. Point dose and planar dose measurements were carried out at each institution, then the measured doses were compared against those calculated by their respective treatment planning systems. Agreement between planned and measured dose was assessed, with gamma passing rates calculated using 5%/1 mm and 3%/1 mm criteria. Results: An average difference of 0.2% and a range of - 4.1% to 4.3% between the ion chamber measured dose at the center of one of the targets and the calculated dose was found. For the 5%/1 mm global gamma criterion, all films achieved passing rates above 97%. All treatment devices showed sub-millimeter spatial dose delivery accuracy, with deviations under 1 mm between measured and planned dose. Conclusions: The results indicated clinically acceptable agreement between the calculated and delivered dose across all treatment delivery systems. This intercomparison provided an opportunity for radiotherapy departments to assess the quality of their SRT treatment planning and delivery and benchmark their performance against other institutions.

Indexed as

Dosimetric intercomparisonIntracranial radiotherapyQuality assurance

Identifiers

PMID42005726
PMCPMC13085090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.