Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42005700›Full record

ReviewVeterinary evidence

Comparison of medical versus surgical management of liver lobe torsion in rabbits.

Rachel Sibbald

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Veterinary evidence. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Rachel SibbaldAbercorn Vets, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-1244-2412

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PICO question: Does medical management of liver lobe torsion in rabbits reduce mortality compared with surgical intervention? Clinical bottom line: Category of research: Treatment. Number and type of study designs reviewed: Six studies were appraised in total. This consisted of three retrospective cohort studies and three case series. Strength of evidence: Weak. Outcomes reported: Medical management carries a similar 7-day survival rate compared to surgical treatment; however, long-term morbidity and mortality is increased compared with surgery. Delayed diagnosis and severe anaemia negatively affect outcomes of both groups. Conclusion: Medical management does not reduce mortality compared with surgical treatment and within the literature there appears to be a preference for surgery when treating rabbits with liver lobe torsion.

Indexed as

anaemiaanaesthesialiver lobe torsionmedicalrabbitsurgery

Identifiers

PMID42005700
PMCPMC12710415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.