Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42005696›Full record

ReviewHealth science reports2026

Sonographic Reporting Completeness and Sonographic Features of Xanthogranulomatous endometritis: A Systematic Review and Quality Scoring Analysis of Case Reports.

Xiang Ji

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Xiang JiDepartment of Ultrasound The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University Suzhou City P.R. China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5993-6338

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Xanthogranulomatous endometritis (XGE) is a rare, chronic inflammatory disease that could mimic endometrial malignancy. While ultrasound is a primary imaging tool in gynecology, a comprehensive synthesis of its features in XGE is lacking. This study aimed to: (1) systematically review and summarize the sonographic characteristics of XGE, and (2) introduce and apply a novel scoring system-demonstrated on XGE-for evaluating the completeness of sonographic reporting in case reports of rare diseases. Methods: A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines, searching PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE for case reports describing ultrasound findings in pathologically confirmed XGE. A novel scoring system was developed and applied to evaluate completeness of sonographic reporting of XGE in case reports. Results: Eighteen case reports were included. The mean quality score was 3.2 out of 8 (range: 1-6). The most frequently reported sonographic features were intrauterine fluid collection or mass (88.9%) and endometrial thickening or irregularity (61.1%). Uterine enlargement was reported in 38.9% of cases. Assessment of vascular features was notably limited, with only three reports (16.7%) documenting the use of Color Doppler; among these, two confirmed the presence of intralesional blood flow, and both of the reports that provided spectral Doppler parameters described a low resistive index (RI < 0.7). Conclusion: This study summarizes the frequently reported sonographic features of XGE, which center on intrauterine abnormalities and endometrial changes. The application of our novel scoring table revealed that the sonographic reporting in existing case reports is often incomplete, with doppler assessment being a notable gap. Future reports would benefit from more detailed doppler and morphological descriptions, which could help build a more reliable evidence base for the preoperative diagnosis of this rare condition.

Indexed as

case reportsscoring systemsystematic reviewultrasonographyXanthogranulomatous endometritis

Identifiers

PMID42005696
PMCPMC13087624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.