Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42005695›Full record

ArticleHealth science reports2026

Effectiveness of Single-Wavelength 755 nm Laser Compared to Dual-Wavelength 755 nm and 1064 nm Laser in Hair Removal: A Split-Body Design With Blinding.

Kawthar Shurrab, Roaa Munif Alnajjar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kawthar ShurrabBiomedical Photonics Laboratory, Higher Institute for Laser Research and Applications Damascus University Damascus Syrian Arab Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0919-832X
Roaa Munif AlnajjarBiomedical Photonics Laboratory, Higher Institute for Laser Research and Applications Damascus University Damascus Syrian Arab Republic.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Laser hair removal (LHR) has become a popular cosmetic procedure for long-term hair reduction, with various laser wavelengths and technologies available. Objective: This study aimed to compare the safety and effectiveness of single-wavelength 755 nm laser compared to dual-wavelength 755 nm and 1064 nm laser in hair removal. Methods: Twenty Syrian women, aged 20-33, with complete data, underwent three axillae laser hair removal treatments at 4-week intervals between January 2024 and May 2024. The participants, who had Fitzpatrick skin types II and III, were divided into two groups using a split-body design with blinding, resulting in a total of 40 axillae treated. They were treated with the Duetto MT laser system, which utilizes Alexandrite and Nd: YAG lasers emitting at 755 nm and 1064 nm, individually or in combination, and equipped with a 14 mm Spot Handpiece. Efficacy was assessed using standardized photographs, hair counts, and the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS). Pain was evaluated using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and safety outcomes were recorded. Results: A superior outcome was recorded for a single-wavelength laser, which showed an overall hair reduction of 92% compared to the dual-wavelength laser an overall reduction of 69%. Hair counting showed a 25% greater hair reduction with a single wavelength. No severe adverse effects were observed or reported for both groups. Conclusion: For skin types II and III, the 755 nm laser is more effective for axillary hair removal than the dual-wavelength laser, even 12 months after treatment. The procedure is considered safe. In contrast, dual-wavelength laser therapy offered no extra benefits and caused slightly more adverse effects.

Indexed as

alexandrite laserefficacylaser hair removalNd:YAG lasersafety

Identifiers

PMID42005695
PMCPMC13087534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.