ReviewHealth science reports2026
Global Evidence on Helmet Use and Misuse: A Public Health Perspective on Prevalence, Determinants and Barriers.
Review in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Helmet wearing is crucial to prevent injuries which is influenced by diverse variables. There are some factors which affect helmet use or non-use resulting in fluctuations in helmet use rate, globally. This study aimed at estimating global helmet use rate and identifying related barriers and determinants. Method: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed till January 2024 through PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Web of Knowledge databases using predefined keywords. Related journals and references of the selected articles were reviewed. Two authors independently screened the retrieved citations, assessed methodological quality, and extracted data using an extraction form. Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were performed to explore differences based on study characteristics, and random effect model was used for meta-analysis through Stata 16. Result: Based on meta-analysis results, including approximately one million people, overall helmet use rate (OHUR) in motorcyclists and passengers were estimated to be 0.54 [0.48-0.59 with 95 CI, I Conclusion: Although approximately half of the motorcyclists and a third of the passengers have used helmet, the correct use was very low. Psychological and cognitive factors were the most important barriers to helmet use. Creating and maintaining a positive attitude in motorcyclists about safety effects of helmet through diverse methods such as peer-groups education, social campaigns, and so forth is recommended. Moreover, developing compatible, comfortable, and affordable helmets should be followed to overarch barriers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.