ArticleHealth science reports2026
Assessment of Food Safety Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Among Fresh Market Vendors and Consumers in Dhaka City, Bangladesh: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Food safety is a major public health concern in Bangladesh, particularly in urban areas where fresh markets are the primary source of food. The objective of the study was to examine food safety Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice (KAP) among fresh market vendors and consumers in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Methods: Cross-sectional data were collected from 406 respondents (205 vendors and 201 consumers) from 2 fresh markets in Dhaka city in 2022. Data were collected using a pretested interview-based questionnaire, and composite KAP scores were calculated. Results: The study found that vendors had inadequate food safety knowledge, a mean score of 12.4 ± 2.6 (77.4% correct responses), and a good level of attitude, 9.7 ± 1.5 (88% correct responses). However, food safety practices were inadequate (5.2 ± 1.1; 57.5% correct responses). Overall, the KAP score was inadequate (27.2 ± 4.0; 75.7% correct response) and positively associated with education and prior food safety knowledge. On the contrary, consumers demonstrated good knowledge (13.5 ± 1.9; 84% correct responses). Consumers' knowledge was also significantly associated with their educational status. Vendors' and consumers' risk perception and risk management were significantly associated with food safety knowledge. About 25.9% of the vendors and 41.8% of the consumers believed that the fresh markets were not regularly inspected. Both vendors (42.9%) and consumers (86.6%) emphasized the importance of regular inspections in the markets. Conclusion: The findings indicate critical gaps between knowledge, attitude, and actual practices of food safety among vendors, alongside limited trust in market inspection systems. Strengthening food safety requires routine inspections, targeted vendor training, consumer awareness campaigns, and coordinated efforts among authorities and communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.