ReviewHealth science reports2026
Personality Traits and Their Association With Falls and Fall-Related Psychological Concerns in Adults Aged 50 and Older: A Scoping Review.
Review in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Falls remain a major health challenge in aging, yet little is known about how personality traits influence falls risk and related psychological concerns. This scoping review mapped existing evidence on relationships among personality traits, falls, fear of falling, and fall self-efficacy in older adults to identify key associations and research gaps. Methods: A comprehensive search of five databases (MEDLINE, APA PsycINFO, Web of Science, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus) was conducted from inception (1945) through December 2024. Eligible studies examined personality traits, assessed with validated instruments, in relation to falls, fear of falling, or fall self-efficacy in older adults (≥ 50 years). All empirical designs were included. Data extraction followed PRISMA-ScR guidance, and findings were synthesized descriptively. Results: Of 8060 records screened, eight studies met the inclusion criteria (three longitudinal, five cross-sectional). High neuroticism and low conscientiousness were the most consistently associated with greater fall risk and higher fear of falling. Extraversion showed generally protective associations with fear of falling, while Type A behaviour predicted higher fall incidence among men but not women. Openness and agreeableness showed no consistent patterns. Evidence on fall self-efficacy was limited to one study, and none addressed balance confidence. Measurement heterogeneity across personality and fall-related constructs limited comparability across studies. Conclusion: Personality traits, particularly emotional instability and conscientiousness, appear relevant to fall risk and psychological concerns, though evidence remains sparse. Key gaps include limited work on fall self-efficacy and balance confidence, under-representation of clinical populations, and inconsistent measurement approaches. Future studies should use standardized instruments, longitudinal designs, and broader personality frameworks to inform personalised fall prevention strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.