Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42005618›Full record

ArticleHealth science reports2026

Rationale and Design of the Cancer Immunotherapy Evidence Living (CIEL) Library: A Continuously Updated Clinical Trial Database of Cancer Immunotherapies.

Kim Boesen, Julian Hirt, Pascal Düblin, Heinz Läubli, Benjamin Kassenda, Lars G Hemkens, Perrine Janiaud

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kim BoesenResearch Center for Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience (RC2NB) University Hospital Basel and University of Basel Basel Switzerland.
Julian HirtResearch Center for Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience (RC2NB) University Hospital Basel and University of Basel Basel Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6589-3936
Pascal DüblinDepartment of Clinical Research University Hospital Basel and University of Basel Basel Switzerland.
Heinz LäubliDepartment of Medical Oncology University Hospital Basel and University of Basel Basel Switzerland.
Benjamin KassendaDepartment of Medical Oncology University Hospital Basel and University of Basel Basel Switzerland.
Lars G HemkensResearch Center for Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience (RC2NB) University Hospital Basel and University of Basel Basel Switzerland.
Perrine JaniaudResearch Center for Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience (RC2NB) University Hospital Basel and University of Basel Basel Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7684-8014

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Immunotherapies for cancers are tested in large numbers of clinical trials. It is difficult for clinicians and researchers to stay current with the evidence, and traditional systematic reviews and clinical guidelines are not suited to ensure a continued overview of all trials and their results. To address this problem, we designed the Cancer Immunotherapy Evidence Living (CIEL) Library. Methods: We included planned, ongoing, and completed interventional trials of immunotherapies for cancer, regardless of trial design (e.g., randomization, blinding, and type of comparator). We systematically searched PubMed (for published reports) and ClinicalTrials.gov (for registered clinical trials). PubMed-retrieved records were screened using the AI-assisted software ASReview and manually extracted and curated. We imported data from ClinicalTrials.gov using the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative database, which then requires further curation. The CIEL-Library was implemented as a web application. It also contained the "Match My Patient" feature, a patient-centered clinical decision support system, aiming to filter planned, ongoing, or completed trials based on four patient characteristics (disease staging, previous treatments, performance status, and location). We piloted our database with one type of cancer immunotherapy, the tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) transfer. The CIEL-Library was a prototype and no further developments are planned. Conclusions: The CIEL-Library offers a blueprint for a dynamic evidence synthesis infrastructure by providing a collection of clinical trials with curated trial characteristics and results. This blueprint may be applied across fields, specialties, and topics. The main challenges to making a database of clinical trials are the time and resources needed to populate it with curated and updated data. The CIEL-Library project highlights the potential and the main limitations of designing trial databases intended to be used in routine care.

Indexed as

cancerdatabasesimmunotherapysystematic reviews

Identifiers

PMID42005618
PMCPMC13087519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.