ArticleResuscitation plus2026
First responder airway and compression rate cluster randomized controlled trial: rational and design.
Article in Resuscitation plus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The specific components of professional first-responder CPR (chest compressions and ventilations) are associated with clinical outcomes following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Yet, this understanding about best-practices CPR is largely informed by observational rather than randomized evaluation. The Design and setting: FACT is a factorial, cluster-randomized, cross-over trial conducted in a large metropolitan region in the United States by Emergency Medical Services (EMS). Study interventions are allocated according to EMS agency every 4 months. Study subjects: The study plans to enroll ∼4200 adults with nontraumatic OHCA treated by first responder firefighter emergency medical technicians (EMTs). Interventions: Randomized interventions will include the initial EMT airway (mask or i-gel supraglottic airway) and the professional rescuer compression rate (100 or 110 or 120 compressions per minute). Inspiratory and expiratory ventilation volume will be assessed in a subset of subjects. Compression rates will be directed by metronome and assessed through review of the defibrillator recording. Outcomes: The primary outcome is survival to hospital discharge; secondary outcomes include return of spontaneous circulation at the end of EMS care and survival with favorable neurological status classified as Cerebral Performance Category of 1 or 2 at hospital discharge. Subgroup analyses: Planned subgroup analyses include intervention comparisons according to sex, initial rhythm, and BLS CPR strategy (30:2 and 10:1). Inference: Results of the FACT study may inform fundamental approaches to first responder CPR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.