Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42005609›Full record

ArticleResuscitation plus2026

Design and rationale of the SPARC trial: a phase II, single-system randomized controlled trial of immediate transfer to specialty post-arrest care.

Jonathan Elmer, Sara DiFiore-Sprouse, Francis X Guyette, Charity G Patterson, Steffen Ventz, Clifton W Callaway, University of Pittsburgh Post-Cardiac Arrest Service

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Resuscitation plus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07002294 (The Effect of SPecialty cAre on Recovery From Cardiac Arrest Trial), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07002294 narecruitingnot on this map

The Effect of SPecialty cAre on Recovery From Cardiac Arrest Trial (the SPARC Trial)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PittsburghRan2026 to 2032Enrolled1,618ConditionsCardiac Arrest (CA), Heart Arrest, Heart Arrest, Out-Of-HospitalArmsTransfer to specialty care, Usual care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jonathan ElmerDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Sara DiFiore-SprouseDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Francis X GuyetteDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Charity G PattersonDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Steffen VentzDivision of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Clifton W CallawayDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
University of Pittsburgh Post-Cardiac Arrest Service

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is common and often fatal. Survivors who reach the hospital require complex, time-sensitive care, but outcomes vary widely across hospitals. Observational data suggest regionalized specialty post-arrest care may improve outcomes, yet the causal effect of an early transfer strategy is uncertain and must be balanced against the risks of interfacility transfer. Methods: SPARC ("The effect of SPecialty cAre on Recovery from Cardiac arrest") is a phase II, parallel-group randomized controlled trial in a single US health system. We will enroll 1618 adults resuscitated from OHCA who survive to emergency department (ED) care. Under Exception from Informed Consent (21 CFR 50.24), participants will be randomly assigned 1:1 to (1) immediate ED-to-ED transfer to a post-cardiac arrest specialty (PCAS) center or (2) usual care at the presenting hospital. The primary outcome is 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) assessed by a trained, blinded outcome assessor. The primary analysis will be intention-to-treat using a covariate-adjusted Bayesian partial proportional odds model. Interim analyses for superiority/futility will occur at 50% and 75%, with a prespecified adaptive sample-size re-estimation at the first interim analysis. Discussion: SPARC directly tests whether an early transfer strategy to a mature PCAS center improves functional outcomes compared with usual care in a mixed urban, suburban, and rural region. Results will inform the design of post-arrest systems of care and the feasibility of a definitive multicenter trial. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT07002294. Protocol version: 1.22 (Version date February 24, 2026; IRB approved February 25, 2026; DSMB approved February 25, 2026).

Indexed as

Bayesian analysisException from informed consentInterfacility transferModified Rankin ScaleOut-of-hospital cardiac arrestSpecialty post-arrest care

Identifiers

PMID42005609
PMCPMC13091543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.