ArticleCase reports in dentistry2026
Porcine Collagen Matrices for the Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recessions: A Case Report With 4 Years Follow-Up.
Article in Case reports in dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Porcine Collagen Matrices for the Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recessions: A Case Report With 4 Years Follow-Up.Case reports in dentistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This case report aimed to evaluate the clinical performance of Mucoderm and Fibro-Gide collagen matrices (CMs) as alternatives to connective tissue graft (CTG) in the treatment of multiple gingival recessions (GRs). Methods: A 37-year-old man, systemically healthy and a nonsmoker patient, with multiple bilateral GR (recession type 1 class [RT1] or Miller Class I) involving teeth 12-16 and 22-26 was surgically treated. Envelope type of coronally advanced flap (CAF) was used in teeth 14-16 and 23-26 associated with Fibro-Gide matrix on the right side and Mucoderm matrix on the left side. Results: Complete root coverage was observed in all GR after 60 days of postoperative, except for tooth 22. In the Fibro-Gide matrix-treated side, a greater increase in keratinized tissue (KT) volume was visually observed after 60 days. However, an apical displacement of approximately 0.50 mm of the marginal gingiva was observed in teeth 14, 15, 24-26 with 12 months, showing stability of the results after 4 years of follow-up. Moreover, no differences regarding KT volume and gingival color/texture were visually observed between both matrices after 5 years. Conclusion: The Mucoderm and Fibro-Gide CMs demonstrated adequate clinical performance for GR coverage in this case report.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.