ArticleJournal of pain research2026
Towards Sex- and Gender-Sensitive Pain Management: Participatory Development of the GESCO Intervention for Chronic Non-Cancer Pain and Long-Term Opioid Therapy in Primary Care.
Article in Journal of pain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) is commonly managed in primary care with long-term opioid therapy (LTOT), despite limited effectiveness and substantial risks. Sex and gender shape pain experiences, treatment responses, and health outcomes, yet are rarely addressed in chronic pain interventions. This study aims to inform primary care pain management by addressing opioid-related harms, gender-based inequities, and the integration of biopsychosocial approaches. Methods: The development of the GESCO intervention was guided by the updated UK Medical Research Council (MRC) Framework for complex interventions. A participatory, theory-informed, and evidence-based approach was employed. Core development steps included literature reviews, qualitative interviews with patients and GPs, and a collaboratively developed Theory of Change (ToC). Intervention modules and evaluation tools were co-created and piloted with the stakeholders. Results: The GESCO intervention is a structured, gender-sensitive, multi-component GP consultation to improve care for patients with chronic pain and LTOT. Two 30-minute consultations integrate narrative medicine, expectation management, medication review, empowerment strategies, and tools such as the Positive Health tool and Social Network Mapping. Implementation is supported by a two-day GP training program, a toolbox of practical resources, and a patient brochure, a manual on sex-/gender-sensitive pharmacotherapy, and follow-up case conferences. Intervention design and evaluation is guided by a ToC framework, drawing on the COM-B model by Michie et al. Conclusion: GESCO represents a theory-informed intervention that aims to integrate gender sensitivity into a structured consultation model for chronic pain care in primary care settings. Its participatory development process is intended to support applicability in routine practice. In a subsequent stage of the project, GESCO will be piloted in ten practices with 40 patients to examine feasibility and explore preliminary effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.