ArticleThe journal of climate change and health
Disparities in health and climate change research funding: The funders and the funded.
Article in The journal of climate change and health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Attributing climate-related health burdens in Southeast Asia: a scoping review.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Climate change has significant impacts on health. This study examines global funding for health and climate change research. Materials: The Dimensions database was used to identify funding awarded between 1990 and 2023 through lower and upper search strategies designed to encompass both focused and more inclusive search approaches. Results: A total of 1,819 grants were identified in the lower search and 3,326 in the upper search, with total funding ranging from USD1.6-2.6 billion, the majority awarded since 2010. Most grants were issued by government (88-90 %) and non-profit (10-11 %) organisations, primarily from the United States (37 %) and the United Kingdom (15 %). Most funding went to educational research organisations (75 %) in high-income countries (78 %) and in the same country as the funder. No funding went to primary research organisations in low-income countries, and fewer than 1 % went to lower-middle income countries. Conclusion: While funding for health and climate change research has increased, inequities persist in the global allocation of this research funding. More support is needed for research in low- and lower-middle-income countries to equitably address the health crisis posed by climate change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.