Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42005549›Full record

ArticleAJOG global reports2026

Exploring social and public healthcare professionals' experiences providing pregnancy intentions and contraceptive counseling in the Netherlands.

Mariëlle Cloin, Wendy Jeeninga

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJOG global reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mariëlle CloinTranzo, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences (TSB) (Cloin and Jeeninga), Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Wendy JeeningaTranzo, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences (TSB) (Cloin and Jeeninga), Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnintended pregnancy (UP) is highly prevalent among individuals with multiple social and/or (mental) health challenges. Despite this, pregnancy intentions and contraceptive options are rarely addressed in routine social and public healthcare. To bridge this gap, the Dutch Not Pregnant Now program integrates person-centered counseling on pregnancy intentions and contraceptive options into a variety of social and preventive public health services that people already access, such as social care, mental health and youth care, and public health programs. Since professionals providing these services play a central role in implementation in practice, their experiences and competencies are relevant for understanding feasibility and impact, and to guide further development and implementation of routine counseling on these topics in the Netherlands and beyond.

objectivesThe aim of this study is to explore social and public healthcare professionals' self-rated ability to deliver counseling on pregnancy intentions and contraceptive options within the context of the Dutch Not Pregnant Now program. Specifically, we aim to identify both strengths and areas for improvement by examining how professionals' reported skills, attitudes, and structural barriers relate to their self-perceived counseling capacity, representing core elements and practical requirements for delivering the counseling within their own work setting and during regular client visits, rather than as a separate activity. STUDY

designA practice-based, cross-sectional study was conducted using 131 self-reported questionnaires completed by trained professionals providing Not Pregnant Now counseling in social and public healthcare. The survey addressed reported responsibility for discussing pregnancy intentions and contraceptive options during regular care visits, skills in motivational interviewing, competence in contraceptive option counseling, client screening practices, and time constraints. Quantitative data were analyzed using ordinary least squares (OLS) regression to explore factors affecting self-rated counseling ability. Open-ended responses were thematically analyzed to provide additional insights and contextualize the findings within practice.

resultsSocial and public healthcare professionals who reported stronger skills in motivational interviewing-particularly in identifying the right moment to initiate the conversation, demonstrating empathy, and applying effective techniques-felt significantly more capable of delivering counseling on pregnancy intentions and contraceptive options during regular care visits. Competence in discussing contraceptive options further enhanced this perceived ability. In contrast, no significant effects were observed for (the lack of) perceived responsibility for providing such counseling, client screening skills, or time constraints. Open-ended responses highlighted the importance of building rapport with clients and creating a nonjudgmental environment to successfully embed counseling into routine care.

conclusionsStrengthening and sustaining professionals' motivational interviewing and contraceptive option counseling skills enhances their confidence and ability to integrate pregnancy intentions and contraceptive option counseling into practice. Embedding these discussions as a normalized component of routine social and public healthcare-services that people already turn to for support-may contribute to more comprehensive, preventive, and person-centered care, supporting unintended pregnancy prevention. The findings highlight the importance of ongoing training, skill development, and normalization of option counseling, not only in the Netherlands but also for other countries seeking to implement this often-overlooked aspect of care within their social and public health systems.

Indexed as

contraceptive counsellingmotivational interviewingpregnancy intentionspublic health care providerssocial care providersunintended pregnancy preventionvulnerable populations

Identifiers

PMID42005549
PMCPMC13091284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.