ReviewAJOG global reports2026
Clinicopathological characteristics and outcomes of gastric-type adenocarcinoma of the cervix: a systematic review.
Review in AJOG global reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Immune remodeling during cervical cancer chemoradiotherapy: temporal biomarkers and the timing of checkpoint blockade.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: We aimed to synthesize current evidence on the clinicopathological features, diagnostic strategies, treatment modalities, and outcomes of gastric-type adenocarcinoma (GAS) of the cervix, a rare and aggressive HPV-independent subtype of cervical adenocarcinoma. Methods: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines and registered on PROSPERO. Comprehensive searches of PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Springer were performed and supplemented by manual searches. Eligible studies were English-language case reports or case series describing histologically confirmed GAS, minimal deviation adenocarcinoma, or adenoma malignum. Data were extracted on clinicopathology, diagnostic modalities, treatments, and outcomes. Quality was appraised using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklists. Results: Fifty-nine studies were included, comprising 51 case reports and 8 case series, with a total of 150 patients. The mean age at diagnosis was 52.8 years, most commonly between 41 and 60 years. Vaginal bleeding and discharge were the leading initial symptoms, although over one-third lacked symptom data. Most cases were diagnosed at FIGO stage I-III, while 16% presented with stage IV disease. Radical hysterectomy was the predominant surgical approach, and concomitant chemoradiotherapy was the most frequent non-surgical treatment. IHC consistently demonstrated MUC6 and CK7 positivity, with frequent abnormal p53 and variable p16 expression. Recurrence occurred in 28.7% of patients, predominantly at distant sites, and 5-year survival was only 26.7%. Conclusion: GAS is a rare, distinct, and highly aggressive cervical adenocarcinoma with poor long-term outcomes and limited responsiveness to standard therapy. Improved diagnostic strategies and tailored treatment protocols are urgently needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.