ReviewAnnals of intensive care2026
Clinical subphenotypes and molecular endotypes in sepsis: toward an integrated and dynamic framework.
Review in Annals of intensive care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Novel Adipokines in Critical Illness and Sepsis: Chemerin, Vaspin, and Omentin-1: A Comprehensive Evidence-Based Review.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Quantifying pathway perturbations based on gene network rewiring in sepsis progression toward death or survival.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sepsis is a highly heterogeneous and life-threatening syndrome associated with high morbidity and mortality worldwide. The repeated failure of large randomized trials underscores the urgent need for precise patient stratification. Recent advances in machine learning and multi-omics technologies have facilitated the identification of distinct clinical subphenotypes and molecular endotypes. Clinical subphenotypes, typically derived from routinely available clinical variables and circulating biomarkers, reflect aggregated downstream manifestations of underlying biological processes; however, the absence of clearly identifiable pathobiological mechanisms specific to each subgroup may limit their utility as actionable treatable traits. In contrast, molecular endotyping leverages multi-omics data to elucidate the pathophysiological drivers of sepsis, offering a foundation for mechanism-based interventions. However, most endotypes remain insufficiently actionable for individualized treatment decisions at the bedside. Furthermore, existing classification frameworks rely predominantly on static assessments, which do not adequately reflect the dynamic evolution of sepsis pathophysiology. Increasing evidence underscores that sepsis is inherently dynamic, with immune responses, metabolic states, and organ dysfunction fluctuating over time. Integrating longitudinal clinical and molecular data to capture the temporal evolution of host responses and organ dysfunction through dynamic subtyping offers a promising approach to optimize patient stratification. In this narrative review, we summarize recent advances in static and dynamic subphenotyping, discuss omics-derived endotypes, and outline strategies to integrate these dimensions into clinically actionable frameworks for precision medicine in sepsis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.