ArticleAfrican journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence2026
Utilization of advanced resuscitation skills among doctors and nurses in Uganda.
Article in African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Sudden cardiac arrest remains a major global health challenge, contributing to approximately 3.7 million deaths annually. In Uganda, in-hospital cardiac arrest incidence stands at 2.3%, with only 7.4% achieving return of spontaneous circulation. Since the formal introduction of advanced resuscitation training in 2019, over 840 Ugandan healthcare professionals had been trained. However, no structured assessment has been conducted to evaluate the real-world utilization of the acquired knowledge and skills or to identify influencing factors. This study provides evidence to improve utilization shortfalls for better patient outcomes following cardiac arrest. Objective: To determine the level and factors affecting the utilization of advanced resuscitation knowledge and skills among doctors and nurses in Uganda. Methods: A cross-sectional telephone survey was conducted among 413 doctors and nurses who had received advanced resuscitation training between 2020 and 2023. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire by trained research assistants. A generalized linear model with robust standard errors was used to identify factors associated with utilization. Prevalence ratios (PRs) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Variables with p-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: Among 413 doctors and nurses analysed, 70.5% reported frequent use of knowledge concepts and skills. Frequent use was 15% less common among males compared to females. Frequent use was highest (85.4%) among specialist doctors followed by medical officers (71.7%) and nurses (66.5%). Clinicians in higher level facilities reported frequent use more often (77.2%) compared to those employed in lower-level units (66.3%). Most ICU health workers (92.2%) reported frequent use while less than half of those in outpatient departments (45.6%) reported frequent use. Conclusion: While approximately 70% of clinicians reported frequent use of advanced resuscitation skills, utilization varied significantly across gender, professional cadres, facility levels, and clinical departments. These differences likely reflect variation in clinical exposure, role expectations, and resource availability rather than differential competency. Enhancing consistent utilization of advanced resuscitation skills requires strengthened reinforcement across health systems, supported by improved access to resuscitation equipment and supplies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.