ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2026
Reproducibility and validity of healthy dietary indices derived from 24-hour dietary recalls.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Plasma Vitamin D and Intermediate Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Insights from the Longitudinal ALIENOR Study.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Healthy dietary indices are commonly used to investigate diet-disease associations, but the reproducibility and validity of these indices from 24-h dietary recalls (24HDRs) are undetermined. We aimed to investigate optimum number of 24HDRs for measuring healthy dietary indices including the Alternate Mediterranean Diet (AMED), Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH), and Healthy Eating Index-2015 (HEI-2015) in epidemiological studies. Methods: From July 2021 to July 2022, 432 participants (median age: 48y, 57.2% women) completed 12-day 24HDRs, comprising four quarterly sets of three consecutive 24HDRs (two weekdays and one weekend day in each season). Energy-adjusted intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to evaluate reproducibility, while energy-adjusted deattenuated Spearman correlation coefficient (rc) were used to examine validity by comparing the estimates against those from the average of 12 24HDRs. Results: The reproducibility and validity coefficient increased with the increasing number of 24HDRs. We observed a "moderate" reproducibility for three non-consecutive 24HDRs in assessing AMED, DASH and HEI-2015 (ICCs: 0.40-0.43). Healthy dietary indices from one 24HDR showed "moderate" validity (rc: 0.42-0.55). Higher body mass index, female sex, and autumn/winter of administration were associated with low reproducibility of AMED and/or HEI-2015. Conclusion: Our results support that three non-consecutive 24HDRs provide acceptable estimates of AMED, DASH, and HEI-2015.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.