Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42005424›Full record

ArticleBuilding acoustics (Brentwood, England)2025

Advancing soundscape assessment in open-plan offices: Insights from expert focus groups.

Zulfi Rachman, Francesco Aletta, Jian Kang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Building acoustics (Brentwood, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zulfi RachmanUCL Institute for Environmental Design and Engineering, The Bartlett, University College London (UCL), London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2221-247X
Francesco AlettaUCL Institute for Environmental Design and Engineering, The Bartlett, University College London (UCL), London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0351-3189
Jian KangUCL Institute for Environmental Design and Engineering, The Bartlett, University College London (UCL), London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Open-plan offices are designed to foster collaboration but often face challenges related to noise and acoustic comfort, which can affect employee well-being and productivity. The soundscape concept offers a holistic approach to assessing and improving these environments, yet existing methods often fall short of capturing the complexity of open-plan offices. This study addresses this gap by developing a structured questionnaire tailored for open-plan offices, integrating acoustic and non-acoustic factors. Expert focus group discussions were conducted to identify and expand upon key factors influencing soundscape assessments, building on insights from prior research. Thematic analysis revealed critical considerations, including individual characteristics, spatial dynamics, sound environment perception, office acoustic metrics, noise control, work performance, and psychosocial conditions. To effectively incorporate these elements, the study recommends adapting existing soundscape frameworks to the specific context of open-plan offices. The proposed approach prioritises brevity, logical structure, and user-friendly language to enhance participant engagement and data quality, enabling practical and insightful assessments centred on user experience.

Indexed as

focus group discussionIndoor soundscapeopen-plan officequestionnairesthematic analysis

Identifiers

PMID42005424
PMCPMC13086230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.