ArticleThe archives of bone and joint surgery2026
Are Standing Spinopelvic Parameters Different in Patients with Hip Osteoarthritis Compared to Healthy Individuals? A Comparative Study.
Article in The archives of bone and joint surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This case-control study aimed to investigate standing sagittal spinopelvic alignment in patients with advanced hip osteoarthritis (HOA) and to determine whether their alignment differs from that of healthy individuals. Methods: This study included 240 participants, comprising 120 healthy individuals in the control group and 120 candidates for total hip arthroplasty due to primary HOA in the case group. Pelvic incidence (PI), sacral slope (SS), and pelvic tilt (PT) were measured in both groups using standing lateral X-rays. Results: The demographic characteristics of the two groups were not significantly different. In patients with primary HOA, the mean PI, PT, and SS angles were 52.3 ± 10.1, 9.2 ± 4.2, and 44.4 ± 9.3 degrees, respectively. In the control group, the mean PI, PT, and SS values in were 50.2 ± 8.1, 11.2 ± 5.5, and 39.1 ± 8.5 degrees, respectively. The P-value indicated no significant difference in spinopelvic parameters between the control and case groups. Conclusion: Our study demonstrated that standing spinopelvic parameters do not significantly differ between patients with primary HOA and healthy individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.