ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2026
A prediction model for the risk of developing HFpEF during hospitalization in patients with acute myocardial infarction.
Article in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: This study aimed to establish a clinical prediction model for evaluating the risk of heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) occurrence in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Methods: We selected AMI patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≥ 50% without a history of HF from the MIMIC-III database (training cohort) and those from The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University (validation cohort). Eligibility criteria for identifying patients who develop HFpEF were based on ICD-9 diagnosis codes in the training cohort and the 2021 European Society of Cardiology HF Guidelines in the external validation cohort. The LASSO-multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the predictive factors for establishing the nomogram prediction model. Then, this model was evaluated by discrimination, calibration, clinical effectiveness, and internal validation. Finally, using the validation cohort, the model was externally validated and updated. Results: 201 patients were included in the training cohort and 65 in the validation cohort. Older age, higher heart rate, higher neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and lower total bilirubin were identified as independent predictors. The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) of the model and the bootstrap validation were 0.823 and 0.804, respectively. Both the prediction model's and the bootstrap validation's calibration curve were in good agreement with the standard reference line, and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test showed Conclusion: Our prediction model provides an additional perspective into the early identification of high-risk patients for HFpEF occurrence following AMI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.