ArticleLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2026
Improving Resident Frontal Sinusotomy Education With Three-Dimensional Surgical Planning Software.
Article in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Improving Resident Frontal Sinusotomy Education With Three-Dimensional Surgical Planning Software.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Frontal sinusotomy remains a technically challenging component of resident training in endoscopic sinus surgery. We hypothesize that the use of three-dimensional (3D) surgical planning software improves resident performance, as measured by blinded supervising surgeon evaluations. This study aims to assess whether 3D planning software enhances resident performance during frontal sinusotomy in live surgical cases. Methods: This is a prospective trial involving unblinded self-evaluations and blinded evaluations from supervising surgeons. Participants alternated between an experimental and control arm. Participants were residents from their second through fifth year of residency, with a total of 9 participants included in the study. Results: Forty-one frontal sinusotomies were included. More challenging and less challenging cases were separated for analysis. Among more challenging procedures, blinded attendings rated resident performance on a scale of 1 to 100 on a number of parameters. They reported residents using 3D planning software were more prepared (77.1 vs. 67.3, Conclusions: Resident performance in frontal sinusotomy was significantly improved when they prepared with 3D planning software prior to challenging frontal sinusotomy cases. Level of Evidence: 2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.