ArticleNeurobiology of stress2026
Integrated brain and body mechanisms underlying acute stress and trauma-related vulnerability.
Article in Neurobiology of stress, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dysregulated stress response has been linked to multiple health issues, yet the brain and body dynamics of acute stress remain poorly understood. Developing interpretable models is imperative in understanding this complex interplay. The present study sought to decode acute stress response by using a systematic data-driven and experimental approach to provide insights into its underlying mechanisms, with implications for accurate prediction, precision intervention, and trauma-related phenotyping. A total of 144 healthy adults (aged 18 - 44 years; 63 men) completed the Montreal Imaging Stress Task. Multimodal electrophysiological signals were recorded throughout the experiment. The interpretable predictive model achieved an excellent test accuracy of 85.37% and revealed several key stress-related features, such as shorter inspiration duration. Causal discovery analyses revealed stress-induced disruption of bottom-up inspiratory influences on frontal neural activity. Deep breathing interventions were found to increase inspiration duration and reduce perceived stress levels. The cluster analysis identified three phenotypes. The stress-vulnerable phenotype, in particular, was found to be more susceptible to stress and have greater exposure to lifetime trauma. These findings advance our understanding of the brain and body psychophysiology causal dynamics of acute stress, identify actionable targets for precision interventions, and reveal distinct phenotypes that may inform individualised stress profiles.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.