ArticleAnesthesiology open2026
Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation for Perioperative Cardiac Arrest in Noncardiac Surgery: A Nationwide Cohort Study in Japan.
Article in Anesthesiology open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Perioperative cardiac arrest is rare but often catastrophic. The use of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) with veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in perioperative settings remains limited. This study evaluated the characteristics and outcomes of patients who underwent ECPR for perioperative cardiac arrest. Methods: This retrospective cohort study used data from the Japanese Intensive Care PAtient Database, a nationwide registry of 129 intensive care units (ICUs), covering fiscal years 2015 to 2023. Adults undergoing noncardiac surgery who experienced cardiac arrest before ICU admission were included. Patients were classified as ECPR if veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was documented. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were discharge to home, transfer to another facility, ICU mortality, length of hospital stay, and length of ICU stay. Multivariable logistic regression, adjusted for potential confounders, was used to assess the association between ECPR and in-hospital mortality. Results: Among 518 patients with perioperative cardiac arrest, 44 (8.5%) received ECPR. The mean age was 66 yr and 62% were male. Patients who received ECPR had higher severity scores, higher lactate levels, and more frequent use of mechanical ventilation and catecholamines than those without ECPR. Unadjusted in-hospital mortality was significantly higher in the ECPR group (61.4 Conclusions: In this nationwide cohort, ECPR was used in 8.5% of patients with perioperative cardiac arrest in noncardiac surgery. Its effect on in-hospital mortality in the studied population remains inconclusive due to the limited sample size. Further data accumulation is warranted to clarify the clinical role of ECPR in this setting.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.