ArticleBiophysical reviews2026
Comparing cryo-EM structures of the vertebrate cardiac muscle thick filament.
Article in Biophysical reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The thick filaments of muscle carry the myosin motors that generate contraction by interacting with actin filaments. Despite decades of research, an atomic model of the vertebrate striated muscle thick filament has been lacking. Three cryo-EM thick filament structures from cardiac muscle have now been reported, revealing the organization of myosin heads in interacting-heads motifs (IHMs) on the thick filament surface, and a complex arrangement of myosin tails, titin, and myosin-binding protein C (MyBP-C) in the filament backbone. The three studies are complementary, coming from two species (mouse and human), two techniques (cryo-electron tomography and single particle cryo-EM), and from muscles treated or untreated with the myosin-stabilizing drug mavacamten. The structures are remarkably similar, agreeing on most elements of molecular organization but differing on the degree of stability of the IHMs and the organization of MyBP-C. The differences arise from the different techniques used and the observation of filaments within, or isolated from, the filament lattice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.