ArticleBiological psychiatry global open science2026
Selective Attention Dynamics in Adults With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Role for Sensory Processing Asymmetry?
Article in Biological psychiatry global open science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Beyond Neural Noise: Critical Dynamics Predict Slower Reaction Times in Adults With and Without ADHD.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Despite persisting symptomatology in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), it remains elusive whether ADHD-related impairments of selective attention are domain general or specific, whether this inattention is related to earlier stimulus encoding or later stimulus-response mappings, and whether it manifests differently in ADHD presentations. Methods: Using an intermodal selective attention task, we investigated whether and when selective attention processes across competing modalities (auditory and visual) differ in adults with inattentive ( Results: Compared with controls, task performance was lower in individuals with ADHD. In both modalities, effects of attending versus ignoring were found in early (<200 ms) and late (>300 ms) processes. During the visual task, staircase-like ADHD presentation differences were found around the N2 when attending to visual and around the P3 when ignoring auditory stimuli. During the auditory task, late-processing ERPs were unaffected by ADHD. Instead, ADHD differences in sustained attention processes were observed across attended and ignored stimuli during early sensory processing (P1). Conclusions: Our data indicate that ADHD-related selective attention impairments persist into adulthood and are context dependent (dominant during visual attention) and accompanied by altered sustained attention. In the combined presentation, postsensory attention processes were more severely affected. The presence of an asymmetric selective attention impairment that favors auditory over visual attention does not support global selective attention deficits in adult ADHD. A discussion of clinical implications with real-life examples is provided.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.