ReviewCureus2026
A Call for Dietary Sugar Restriction Policy in India in Light of Oral Health Concerns.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rising sugar consumption in India, particularly from sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) and ultra-processed foods, has intensified the burden of oral and systemic diseases. Excessive intake of free sugars is strongly linked with dental caries, obesity, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular disease, contributing to escalating health and economic costs. Despite global guidelines advocating for reduced free sugar intake, India lacks a comprehensive national strategy to address this shared risk factor for oral and non-communicable diseases (NCDs). This article integrates international evidence and India-specific data to demonstrate the health and economic impact of sugar consumption and to evaluate the effectiveness of fiscal, regulatory, and educational interventions. Global experiences with excise taxes on SSBs, mandatory front-of-package (FOP) labelling, and restrictions on child-directed marketing have proven successful in reducing sugar intake and prompting industry reformulation. In India, however, policy efforts remain fragmented, with limited taxation and weak regulatory enforcement. We propose a multisectoral framework tailored to India's epidemiological and socioeconomic context. Recommended measures include a tiered excise tax on high-sugar foods and beverages, mandatory interpretive FOP warning labels, comprehensive bans on marketing to children, school-based sugar control measures, and integration of preventive oral health promotion into primary care. Strengthening surveillance of sugar intake, caries prevalence, and policy outcomes, alongside allocating tax revenues for health promotion and nutrition subsidies, is vital to ensure equity and sustainability. A comprehensive dietary sugar reduction policy would safeguard children's oral health, reduce future NCD burden, and generate long-term economic and societal benefits for India.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.