Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42005236›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Integrated Management of Cardio-Renal-Metabolic Disorders in India: A Nationwide Physician Survey.

Abdul Hamid Zargar, Johann Christopher, Sanjeev Hiremath, Sameer Muchhala, Vishal Gala

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Abdul Hamid ZargarEndocrinology, Center for Diabetes and Endocrine Care, Srinagar, IND.
Johann ChristopherCardiology, Care Hospitals, Hyderabad, IND.
Sanjeev HiremathInternal Medicine, Sagar Hospitals, Bangalore, IND.
Sameer MuchhalaMedical Affairs, Zydus Lifesciences Limited, Mumbai, IND.
Vishal GalaMedical Affairs, Zydus Healthcare Limited, Mumbai, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Cardiovascular, renal, and metabolic (CaReMe) disorders represent an interlinked group of conditions. Multimorbidity is frequent among patients with diabetes; 43% also have hypertension, and nearly 28% of hypertensive individuals have diabetes. Despite growing evidence and guideline recommendations for integrated care, limited data exist on how physicians in India perceive and manage CaReMe conditions in routine practice. Objectives To describe physician-reported practices, diagnostic routines, perceptions, and barriers related to the integrated management of cardio-renal-metabolic (CaReMe) conditions among practicing physicians in India using a cross-sectional survey design. Methods A descriptive survey was conducted among 1,025 physicians, including consulting physicians, diabetologists, cardiologists, endocrinologists, and nephrologists, with at least one year of clinical experience. Data were collected using a pre-tested, structured electronic questionnaire and analysed descriptively. Results The majority of respondents were consulting physicians (57.7%, n = 591) or diabetologists (25.7%, n = 263). The majority had 11-20 years of clinical experience, and one-third reported seeing more than 200 patients per month. According to the respondents, the most common comorbid conditions were diabetes (75.8%, n = 777), dyslipidaemia (74.1%, n = 760), obesity (71.1%, n = 729), and hypertension (70.4%, n = 721). The most frequently performed routine diagnostic assessments were glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c; 82.4%, n = 845), lipid profile (80.7%, n = 827), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (78.0%, n = 800), and microalbuminuria (74.8%, n = 767). However, only 16.1% (n = 165) of physicians recognised CaReMe conditions as direct contributors to cardiovascular and renal outcomes, while 82% (n = 841) considered integrated management to be important. The most common barriers included patient affordability (76%, n = 779), lack of awareness (74.1%, n = 760), limited consultation time (69.7%, n = 714), and inadequate guidelines (63.1%, n = 647). Across all three disease-combination categories, the largest proportion of physicians selected the five to 10 patients-per-month category for newly diagnosed cases. Conclusion This nationwide survey highlights the high adoption of recommended diagnostic practices but reveals a significant disconnect between the implementation of diagnostic practices and physician awareness of the interconnections between CaReMe. Persistent barriers, including affordability, the absence of standardized national guidelines, and limited consultation time, underscore the urgent need for coordinated policy and educational interventions. Strengthening physician training, harmonizing clinical guidelines, improving financial accessibility, and promoting holistic care models are essential steps toward improving patient outcomes and mitigating the growing CaReMe burden in India.

Indexed as

cardiovascular diseasecardiovascular renal metabolic (careme) disorderschronic kidney diseasediabetesmultimorbidity

Identifiers

PMID42005236
PMCPMC13091070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.