ArticleCureus2026
Improving Completion of a Routine Outcome Measure at Admission and Discharge in a National Health Service Crisis Team: A Quality Improvement Study.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Routine outcome monitoring is an important component of contemporary mental health care. Completion of structured outcome measures at admission and discharge supports clinical decision-making and service evaluation. Local policy within National Health Service Greater Glasgow and Clyde (NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde) requires completion of the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation - 10 item measure (CORE-10) at these time points. This study evaluated baseline compliance within the Renfrewshire Intensive Home Treatment Team (IHTT) and assessed the impact of targeted quality improvement interventions. Methods A quality improvement audit cycle study was conducted across two audit cycles in August and November 2025. All patients admitted by the service during each month were included. The primary outcome was documented completion of the CORE-10 measure at admission and discharge. Interventions implemented between cycles included structured teaching sessions, visual reminders, and weekly multidisciplinary team prompts. Proportions were compared using chi-square testing. Results Twenty-nine patients were included in cycle one and twenty-eight in cycle two. Admission completion improved from four of twenty-nine patients (13.8%) to fifteen of twenty-eight patients (53.6%) following intervention (χ² = 10.04, p = 0.002). Discharge completion remained low, from one of twenty-nine patients (3.4%) to one of twenty-eight patients (3.6%) (χ² = 0.00, p = 0.97). Conclusion Targeted educational and team-based interventions significantly improved admission completion of a routine outcome measure within a crisis service. However, discharge completion remained poor, suggesting persistent structural barriers at transition points in care. Further system-level strategies are required to embed sustainable discharge outcome monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.