ReviewCureus2026
Early Warning Signs of Autism: A Systematic Review of Nonverbal Behavioral Markers and Early Developmental Red Flags in Children Under 36 Months.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early identification of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) remains a priority because clinical diagnosis often occurs after the earliest stages of development, and early behavioral signs can be subtle and variable across children. This systematic review summarized evidence on early nonverbal behavioral markers measured before 36 months that are associated with later-ASD diagnosis or classification. A PRISMA-aligned search was conducted. Eligible studies assessed nonverbal behavioral markers before age three and reported ASD outcomes at a later follow-up. Data were extracted on study design, population, marker domains, assessment methods, and predictive performance when reported. Risk of bias was assessed using tools matched to the study type. Findings were synthesized narratively because studies differed in cohorts, tasks, and outcome definitions. Across the included studies, early ASD-related signals most often appeared as differences in developmental change over time rather than as fixed abnormalities present from birth. Evidence was most consistent for differences in social visual engagement and attention flexibility during the first year of life, with more apparent differences from late infancy into the second year in attention disengagement, repetitive and sensory-linked behaviors, and motor and postural development. Predictive performance for single markers was generally limited. At the same time, combinations across domains and multimodal approaches appeared more useful, although they still require external validation and more transparent reporting before use in practice. Overall, the evidence supports longitudinal surveillance that combines multiple early behavioral domains to improve early risk identification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.