ReviewCureus2026
Culturally Competent Oncology Care for Muslim Patients: A Case-Based Narrative Review of Barriers and Clinical Outcomes.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Faith, Culture, and Cancer: A Qualitative Study Exploring Muslim Women's Perspectives on Clinical Trials in the United Kingdom.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Given the growing Muslim population in the United States, oncology providers increasingly encounter patients whose healthcare decisions are deeply influenced by religious and cultural beliefs. This paper addresses existing gaps in culturally competent cancer care for Muslim patients, identifies barriers affecting healthcare utilization, and proposes practical solutions to enhance clinical outcomes, patient trust, and patient satisfaction. A case-based narrative review analyzes critical intersections between Islamic faith, cultural practices, and oncology care delivery. The case of a Muslim Syrian refugee woman with metastatic breast cancer is utilized to highlight real-world challenges related to delayed care-seeking behaviors, modesty and gender sensitivity, dietary restrictions, spiritual care needs, and end-of-life considerations. This analysis integrates findings from existing literature on health disparities, cultural competence frameworks, and ethical considerations relevant to oncology practice. Muslim patients frequently encounter unique barriers to timely cancer diagnosis and treatment, such as spiritual interpretations of illness, modesty-related concerns, adherence to dietary laws, and misconceptions about palliative care. These factors contribute to reduced participation in cancer screening and delayed care, adversely impacting clinical outcomes. In the featured case, personalized interventions - including care provided by a female Muslim oncologist, integration of spiritual practices, and respectful accommodation of Islamic values - markedly improved patient engagement, treatment acceptance, and overall satisfaction. To effectively serve Muslim oncology patients, healthcare systems and providers must embrace a culturally competent model of care. Training clinicians in cultural humility and Islamic healthcare considerations, implementing gender-sensitive protocols, ensuring access to halal dietary options, and integrating spiritual support can reduce healthcare disparities. An "Ask, Don't Judge" approach fosters patient-provider trust, ultimately promoting better clinical outcomes and enhancing patient experiences within oncology practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.