ReviewPlastic surgery (Oakville, Ont.)2026
Advancements in Smart Wound Dressings: Leveraging Sensor Technology for Real-Time Wound Monitoring and Management.
Review in Plastic surgery (Oakville, Ont.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intelligent Real-Time Healthcare and Biomedical Monitoring Systems: A Narrative Review of AI, IoT, and Emerging Technologies.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Multifunctional Silk Fibroin-Curcuminoid Films Combining Regenerative and Antioxidant Properties with pH Sensing for Wound Dressing Applications.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Topical strategies for antimicrobial delivery of peptide medicines for the management of chronic wounds.Discover nano · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Inherited Epidermolysis Bullosa: Current Evidence, Challenges, and Future Directions.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Advanced Functional Wound Dressings in Precision Surgery: Immunometabolic Reprogramming, Bioadaptive Biomaterials, and Intelligent Regenerative Interfaces.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This review aims to evaluate smart wound dressings (SWDs) that integrate sensor technology for real-time monitoring of acute and chronic wounds, with emphasis on clinical relevance, validation status, and translational limitations. Methods: A structured literature search was performed to identify preclinical, translational, and human studies evaluating sensor-enabled wound dressings, including technologies measuring temperature, pH, moisture, and infection-associated parameters. Relevant studies were selected based on applicability to sensor-integrated wound monitoring. Key features extracted included sensing modality, validation model, regulatory context, and reported clinical applicability. Results: Sensor-enabled wound dressings demonstrate promising noninvasive approaches to wound monitoring; however, the level of clinical validation varies widely. While some systems have advanced to limited human use supported by observational data, many remain at the preclinical or early feasibility stage. Direct comparisons with established diagnostic standards and robust patient-centered outcome data are largely lacking. Conclusions: SWDs represent a rapidly evolving field with significant potential to improve wound monitoring. Current clinical adoption is constrained by limited comparative validation and regulatory pathways that do not require demonstrated efficacy. Future studies benchmarking these technologies against accepted diagnostic standards will be essential to defining their clinical role.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.