ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Gamble game: a pilot mixed-methods study on board games for adolescent gambling prevention in the school setting.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adolescent gambling is an increasing public health concern, posing risks to emotional and social development. Despite legal prohibitions, the normalization of gambling through advertising and informal contexts promotes cognitive distortions and unrealistic expectancies among youth. Evidence-based preventive programs using participatory and engaging methods are therefore crucial. This pilot study evaluated Game in Lab, a cluster-randomized school-based intervention co-developed by universities, local health services, and the third sector. The program employed board game activities and guided debriefing to enhance awareness, critical thinking, and emotional reflection on risk, aiming to deconstruct gambling-related misconceptions. A total of 210 students participated, and 129 completed pre- (T0) and post-intervention (T1) measures. Classes were randomized to intervention or control conditions. Quantitative outcomes included the Gambling Related Cognitions Scale (GRCS) and Gambling Expectancy Questionnaire-Modified (GEQ-MOD); qualitative data were collected through three focus groups with intervention students. Descriptive analyses indicated reductions in cognitions and expectancies across groups, but cluster-adjusted ANCOVAs did not confirm additional effects for the intervention group, which maintained slightly higher post-test scores. Conversely, thematic analysis showed increased critical thinking about probability, greater emotional awareness, and improved understanding of gambling risks. Overall, findings suggest that board games are a feasible and engaging tool for school-based gambling prevention. While quantitative results were mixed, qualitative evidence highlights their potential to foster reflection and awareness among adolescents. Future larger-scale studies with follow-ups are recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.