Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42005023›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Climate change perspectives in Lithuania: exploring science attitudes and personality correlations.

Aelita Skarzauskiene, Monika Mačiulienė, Aistė Diržytė

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Aelita SkarzauskieneMykolas Romeris University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Monika MačiulienėMykolas Romeris University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Aistė DiržytėMykolas Romeris University, Vilnius, Lithuania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Public responses to climate change are influenced by interpretations of scientific information and individual differences. Understanding these factors can improve targeted climate communication. Methods: We conducted a nationally representative survey of Lithuanian adults ( Results: LPA using three climate-belief indicators supported a two-class solution among respondents with complete data ( Discussion: The findings reveal heterogeneity in climate-change beliefs in Lithuania and suggest that audience segmentation and psychologically informed communication strategies may enhance climate-related science communication.

Indexed as

attitudes toward scienceclimate changelatent profile analysisLithuaniascience communication

Identifiers

PMID42005023
PMCPMC13083002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.