ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Predictive processes linking sense of agency and fatigue: a novel allostatic framework.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Errors or Adaptations? A Critical Review of Predictive Processing in Psychiatry.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The sense of agency and the experience of fatigue are usually treated as separate constructs: one concerning perceived control over action, the other reflecting subjective energetic state. However, both rely on how the brain predicts, evaluates, and updates information about the body and its actions. Despite this conceptual proximity, the two phenomena have rarely been examined together, and no unified framework currently explains why changes in perceived control and perceived effort so often co-occur. The aim of this review was to provide such integrative framework. We first examined behavioral, clinical, and neuroimaging evidence indicating that both agency and fatigue rely on the precision of anticipatory models that guide action and bodily regulation. When predictions align with incoming sensory and interoceptive signals, individuals experience a stable sense of control and low perceived effort. When these predictions become imprecise or mismatched, disruptions can arise in both domains. We then evaluated existing theoretical models for agency and fatigue and highlighted the limitations of accounts that treat the two phenomena independently or assume unidirectional relationships. Building on these limitations, we propose an allostasis-based model in which agency and fatigue emerge from the same anticipatory system governing energy regulation. In this view, perturbations in prediction can propagate across systems, producing parallel disruption in perceived control and effort. This new integrative perspective underscores the need for research designs that assess agency and fatigue jointly and provides a conceptual foundation for understanding their co-occurrence across healthy and clinical populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.