ArticleFrontiers in immunology2026
Adverse drug reaction assessment of pembrolizumab and nivolumab in esophageal cancer treatment based on the US FAERS database.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Esophageal cancer (EC) is one of the most aggressive malignant tumors, associated with high mortality rates. Pembrolizumab and nivolumab have been incorporated into immunotherapy regimens for advanced EC, but immune-related adverse events (irAEs) remain a major factor affecting antitumor efficacy. This study aims to conduct a comprehensive and systematic analysis of adverse events (AEs) associated with pembrolizumab and nivolumab in EC immunotherapy using the FAERS database, providing new insights to optimize clinical practice. Methods: All AE reports related to pembrolizumab in EC were extracted from the FAERS database. Disproportionality analyses were performed using three algorithms, including the ROR, PRR, BCPNN. Based on Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank tests, the median time to onset and associated risk factors for relevant AEs were determined. Finally, univariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for death associated with AEs. Result: A total of 3,669 AE reports related to pembrolizumab and 4,308 AE reports related to nivolumab were identified. Descriptive analysis showed that the number of AE reports increased year by year, and the number of reports was higher in the elderly population. The United States, Japan, and China were the primary reporting countries. The overall median time to onset for pembrolizumab-related PTs was 35 days, while that for nivolumab-related PTs was 52 days. In pembrolizumab, age ≥ 65 years was a risk factor for shorter median onset time, whereas in nivolumab, female gender was a risk factor for shorter median onset time. Among pembrolizumab-related AEs, weight was associated with a higher mortality risk. For nivolumab-related AEs, age, weight, increased cumulative number of adverse reactions, and earlier median onset time were associated with higher mortality risk. Conclusion: This real-world study is the first to analyze pembrolizumab and nivolumab irAEs in EC using the FAERS database, identifying high-signal events such as endocrine, hepatic, renal, gastrointestinal toxicities. Additional cardiovascular and pulmonary events are observed. Female and older patients experienced earlier irAEs. Increased mortality risk was associated with weight, cumulative number of AEs, and earlier irAE onset. These findings can guide personalized treatment, early intervention, and improve prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.