ArticleQuality & quantity2026
Unlocking insights: assessing the quality of conventional and image-based responses on books at home in an online mobile survey.
Article in Quality & quantity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite growing interest in collecting photos within online surveys, little is known about the quality of visual data and its comparison with data obtained through conventional requests. To address this gap, a self-administered online mobile survey targeting parents of children attending primary school in Spain was conducted through the Netquest opt-in panel in 2023. The survey gathered information about books in respondents' homes through photos and conventional questions. First, a review of previous research using conventional questions, photos, and other emerging data types was conducted to identify indicators suitable to evaluate the quality of the information about books at home collected through conventional and image-based formats. Second, most of these indicators to measure quality were estimated. Results reveal important measurement errors in conventional questions, while photos submitted by respondents are generally in line and can be classified. However, concrete information of interest about the books, such as the intended audience or languages, is often difficult to extract from photos. When comparing quality, conventional answers provide more information about the items asked than photos, but photos have the potential to provide additional insights, such as book titles. Overall, while collecting and analyzing photos sent through surveys presents challenges, their integration into surveys offers unique opportunities to enrich data collection methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.