Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42004884›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical education2026

Can You Help ChatGPT Get an "A" in Organic Chemistry? Teaching Effective Prompting of Large Language Models for Reaction Prediction.

Elizabeth S Thrall, Olivia M Vanden Assem, Julia A Schneider, Joshua Schrier, Sebastian Tassoti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elizabeth S ThrallDepartment of Chemistry & Biochemistry, Fordham University, The Bronx, New York 10458, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7670-3939
Olivia M Vanden AssemDepartment of Chemistry & Biochemistry, Fordham University, The Bronx, New York 10458, United States.
Julia A SchneiderDepartment of Chemistry & Biochemistry, Fordham University, The Bronx, New York 10458, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4030-7731
Joshua SchrierDepartment of Chemistry & Biochemistry, Fordham University, The Bronx, New York 10458, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2071-1657
Sebastian TassotiCenter for Chemistry Education, Institute of Chemistry, University of Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1262-7735

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools such as large language models (LLMs) become widespread, they are increasingly finding applications in chemical sciences. Although LLMs have achieved impressive performance in many chemistry tasks, optimal performance requires proper use, including appropriate prompting techniques. Chemistry students are not generally taught strategies for effective LLM usage, especially for nonwriting tasks. Here we report an activity that introduces organic chemistry students to the use of LLMs such as ChatGPT for predicting the outcome of chemical reactions, specifically the types of alkene addition reactions taught in introductory organic chemistry courses. This activity exposes students to molecular representations, digitization of chemical reactions, train-test splitting practices for evaluating performance, and generalizable LLM prompting strategies, namely, the Five "S" prompt-writing approach and in-context learning. We tested this activity with chemistry students in the USA and in Austria and evaluated the activity through anonymous pre- and postlab surveys. Survey data revealed that students felt that they achieved their learning goals and that the activity was enjoyable. As chemistry students will inevitably interact with LLMs in their future careers, it is important to teach best practices for the effective and critical use of these tools in the context of chemistry.

Indexed as

Alkene ReactionsComputer-Based LearningGenerative AILarge Language ModelsOrganic ChemistryPromptingUndergraduate

Identifiers

PMID42004884
PMCPMC13085231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.