Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42004867›Full record

ArticleJournal of industrial ecology2023

Estimating carbon footprints from large scale financial transaction data.

Anna Trendl, Anne Owen, Lara Vomfell, Lena Kilian, John Gathergood, Neil Stewart, David Leake

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of industrial ecology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anna TrendlBehavioural Science, Lloyds Banking Group, 25 Gresham Street, London, EC2V 7HN UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1994-4207
Anne OwenSchool of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3872-9900
Lara VomfellBehavioural Science, Lloyds Banking Group, 25 Gresham Street, London, EC2V 7HN UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5264-9897
Lena KilianLeeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0885-1198
John GathergoodSchool of Economics, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0067-8324
Neil StewartWarwick Business School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2202-018X
David LeakeBehavioural Science, Lloyds Banking Group, 25 Gresham Street, London, EC2V 7HN UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2361-9394

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Financial transactions are increasingly used by consumer apps and financial service providers to estimate consumption-based carbon emissions. This approach promises a low-resource, ultra-fast, and highly scalable approach to measuring emissions at different levels of potential policy intervention-spanning the national, subnational, local, and individual level. Despite this potential, there is a lack of research exploring the validity of this approach to carbon profiling. Here we address this oversight in three ways. First, we provide a step-by-step description of our approach toward estimating carbon footprints from micro-level transaction data generated by more than 100,000 customers of a large retail bank in the United Kingdom. Second, we quantitatively compare emission estimates obtained from transaction data with those calculated from a more standard data source used in carbon profiling, the largest household expenditure survey in the United Kingdom. Third, we offer a detailed qualitative comparison of the advantages and disadvantages of transactions versus alternative data sources (such as survey data), across key dimensions including data availability, data quality, and data detail. We find that financial transactions offer a credible alternative to survey-based sources and, if made more widely accessible, could provide important advantages for profiling emissions. These include objective, micro-level data on consumption behaviors, larger sample sizes, and longitudinal, frequent data capture. Supplementary Information: The online version of this article (doi:10.1111/jiec.13351) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Indexed as

big datacarbon footprintconsumptiongreenhouse gas emissionshousehold expenditureindustrial ecology

Identifiers

PMID42004867
PMCPMC13090182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.