ArticleJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics2026
Article in Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: This systematic review aimed to evaluate the influence of storage medium, moisture status, temperature, and duration on the Methods: The study is reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guideline. Results: Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Dehydration consistently increased the detection of crack-like artifacts compared with moist storage (pooled OR = 56.66). Microleakage was greater under less favorable storage conditions (pooled MD = 0.97). Limitations: The evidence base consisted of small laboratory studies with variable reporting. Conclusions: Preanalytical storage conditions substantially influence Registration: The protocol had been registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO; CRD420251179938).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.