Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42004796›Full record

ArticleJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics2026

Predicting outcomes of nonsurgical retreatment with artificial intelligence: A multicenter retrospective study using logistic regression, random forest, and extreme gradient boosting.

Shreshtha Muskan, T Vigneshwar Sambandam, Pradeep Solete, Giampiero Rossi-Fedele, Gianrico Spagnuolo, Kavalipurapu Venkata Teja, Salvatore Scolavino, Niccolò Giuseppe Armogida

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Shreshtha MuskanDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
T Vigneshwar SambandamDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Pradeep SoleteDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Giampiero Rossi-FedeleSchool of Dentistry, Adelaide University, Australia.
Gianrico SpagnuoloDepartment of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Kavalipurapu Venkata TejaDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Malla Reddy Institute of Dental Sciences, Malla Reddy Vishwavidyapeeth, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Salvatore ScolavinoDepartment of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Niccolò Giuseppe ArmogidaDepartment of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Nonsurgical root canal retreatment is a complex procedure influenced by multiple clinical and procedural factors, making accurate prediction of healing outcomes difficult. Machine learning offers a potential approach to enhance prognostic precision and guide clinical decisions in endodontic retreatment. Materials and Methods: A retrospective multicenter dataset of 1100 patients treated between 2015 and 2023 was analyzed. Demographic, clinical, and treatment-related variables were collected. Logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) models were developed using a 70:30 training-testing split with cross-validation. Model performance was assessed using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, area under the curve-receiver operating characteristic (AUC-ROC), and Brier scores. Predictor importance was evaluated using Shapley Additive Explanations. Results: The overall healing rate of apical periodontitis was 82%. LR achieved moderate discrimination (AUC-ROC = 0.81), RF showed better performance (0.88), and XGBoost achieved the highest accuracy (0.91; Brier score = 0.12). Negative predictors included preoperative periapical lesions, molar teeth, poor restorations, posts/cores, and multiple prior treatments. Favorable healing was associated with the absence of lesions and good coronal restorations. Conclusions: Among the tested models, XGBoost demonstrated the highest prognostic accuracy for predicting healing following non-surgical root canal retreatment. Its strong predictive capability supports its potential application in clinical decision-making, warranting further prospective validation.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceendodontic prognosismachine learningroot canal retreatment

Identifiers

PMID42004796
PMCPMC13086396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.