ArticleJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics2026
Predicting outcomes of nonsurgical retreatment with artificial intelligence: A multicenter retrospective study using logistic regression, random forest, and extreme gradient boosting.
Article in Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparative benchmark assessment of performance of six different large language models in clinical decision-making for vital pulp therapy.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Nonsurgical root canal retreatment is a complex procedure influenced by multiple clinical and procedural factors, making accurate prediction of healing outcomes difficult. Machine learning offers a potential approach to enhance prognostic precision and guide clinical decisions in endodontic retreatment. Materials and Methods: A retrospective multicenter dataset of 1100 patients treated between 2015 and 2023 was analyzed. Demographic, clinical, and treatment-related variables were collected. Logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) models were developed using a 70:30 training-testing split with cross-validation. Model performance was assessed using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, area under the curve-receiver operating characteristic (AUC-ROC), and Brier scores. Predictor importance was evaluated using Shapley Additive Explanations. Results: The overall healing rate of apical periodontitis was 82%. LR achieved moderate discrimination (AUC-ROC = 0.81), RF showed better performance (0.88), and XGBoost achieved the highest accuracy (0.91; Brier score = 0.12). Negative predictors included preoperative periapical lesions, molar teeth, poor restorations, posts/cores, and multiple prior treatments. Favorable healing was associated with the absence of lesions and good coronal restorations. Conclusions: Among the tested models, XGBoost demonstrated the highest prognostic accuracy for predicting healing following non-surgical root canal retreatment. Its strong predictive capability supports its potential application in clinical decision-making, warranting further prospective validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.