Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42004789›Full record

ArticleJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics2026

Comparative assessment of the resin-dentin interface using three different universal adhesives: An

B Sai Krishna, Sahithi Nammaniwar, Sita Mahalakshmi Koppu, K P Divakar, Rajani Punna

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

B Sai KrishnaDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, ESIC Dental College and Hospital, Kalaburagi, Karnataka, India.
Sahithi NammaniwarDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Tirumala Institute of Dental Sciences and Research Centre, Nizamabad, Telangana, India.
Sita Mahalakshmi KoppuDepartment of Periodontology and Implantology, Atal hospital, Bina Project, NCL, Coal India Limited, 231220, Uttar Pradesh, India.
K P DivakarDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, ESIC Dental College and Hospital, Kalaburagi, Karnataka, India.
Rajani PunnaDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Kamineni Institute of Dental Sciences, Narketpally, Telangana, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Universal self-etch adhesives are increasingly used in restorative dentistry, but comparative evidence about their penetration and interface quality in dentin under simulated clinical conditions is limited. Objectives: To evaluate and compare the resin-dentin interface, depth of penetration, and hybrid layer thickness using three universal self-etch adhesives Single Bond Universal, Tetric N Bond Universal, and Solare Universal Bond under simulated pulpal pressure. Materials and Methods: Forty-five caries-free premolars, extracted for orthodontic reasons, were randomly assigned to three groups. Standardized Class I cavities (1 mm depth into dentin) were restored using each adhesive (15 teeth/group) and corresponding composites. Adhesives were mixed with 0.1% rhodamine B, applied according to manufacturer instructions, and light-cured in two layers. After extraction and storage, specimens were sectioned and examined under confocal laser scanning microscopy for hybrid layer thickness and resin tag penetration. Data were analyzed with ANOVA and Results: Tetric N Bond Universal showed the highest mean resin tag penetration (697.6 ± 130.0 µm) and hybrid layer thickness (528.7 ± 117.2 µm), statistically different from Single Bond Universal (634.8 ± 71.7 µm tag, 478.3 ± 85.5 µm hybrid layer) and Solare Universal Bond (644.4 ± 92.9 µm tag, 512.7 ± 105.5 µm hybrid layer). No significant difference was found between Single Bond Universal and Solare Universal Bond. All groups demonstrated clinically acceptable interfaces with well-formed hybrid layers and resin tag penetration. Conclusion: Among the tested adhesives, Tetric N Bond Universal exhibited superior hybrid layer thickness and resin tag penetration. This may relate to its specific chemical composition and hydrophilic-hydrophobic monomer balance. Further research with larger samples and additional performance outcomes is warranted.

Indexed as

Confocal laser scanning microscopyhybrid layerpenetration depthresin-dentin interfaceself-etchuniversal adhesives

Identifiers

PMID42004789
PMCPMC13086372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.