Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42004782›Full record

ArticleInternational review of social psychology2026

Dyadic Dynamic in Generalized Political Attitudes: Homophily, Relationship Satisfaction, and Convergence.

Andreas Miculka, Roland Imhoff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International review of social psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Andreas MiculkaDepartment of Social and Legal Psychology, University of Mainz, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-4273-4326
Roland ImhoffDepartment of Social and Legal Psychology, University of Mainz, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0807-463X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the social nature of generalized political attitudes such as conspiracy mentality, right-wing authoritarianism (RWA), and social dominance orientation (SDO), dyadic phenomena concerning these attitudes have not been comprehensively investigated. Employing Response Surface Analysis on two longitudinal samples of couples in romantic relationships (

Indexed as

conspiracy mentalityhomophilyresponse surface analysisright-wing authoritarianismsocial dominance orientation

Identifiers

PMID42004782
PMCPMC13089360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.