ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2026
The Bold Surgeon Syndrome: Contemporary Analysis of Overconfidence, Training Gaps, and Patient Safety in Plastic Surgery.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The "bold surgeon syndrome" describes a growing phenomenon in modern plastic surgery, in which technical confidence surpasses clinical maturity and self-criticism. This study aims to characterize its cognitive, educational, social, and institutional determinants, analyzing how overconfidence, rapid training models, and social media exposure may compromise patient safety. Methods: An integrative analytical review was performed, combining scientific evidence from psychology, surgical education, ethics, and patient safety. Articles published between 2000 and 2025 were selected from PubMed and Scopus using terms such as Results: Findings demonstrate that early-career surgeons frequently overestimate their competence, a pattern consistent with the Dunning-Kruger effect. Short commercial training courses and the absence of structured mentorship reinforce premature autonomy. Social media amplifies the pursuit of recognition over prudence, whereas institutional systems often fail to provide continuous supervision. In contrast, structured checklists and safety cultures significantly reduce errors derived from impulsive decision-making. Conclusions: The bold surgeon syndrome arises from an imbalance between technical skill and reflective judgment. Its prevention requires integrating mentorship, formal evaluation of competence, adherence to safety protocols, and ethical responsibility in digital communication. Recognizing this behavioral pattern is essential to protect patients, sustain surgical integrity, and guide the next generation toward mature and safe practice.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.