ReviewOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2026
Farmer-veterinarian interaction as multi-level situated learning: Negotiating health, risk, and responsibility in intensive pig farming - a scoping review.
Review in One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Farmer-veterinarian interaction is central to how responsibility for animal health and antimicrobial use is enacted. Especially in intensive pig systems, where high animal density, economic pressures, and stringent biosecurity requirements elevate both zoonotic risks and public health concerns. Yet, empirical research on these interactions remains limited as these are often embedded in broader animal health studies and disproportionately focused on dairy contexts. This scoping review synthesizes 40 empirical studies on farmer-veterinarian interaction in intensive pig farming, applying PRISMA-ScR methodology and a four-level socio-ecological framework encompassing individual, interpersonal, interprofessional, and systemic influences. Eligible sources included all studies including relevant empirical insights published until July 2023, with no geographical restrictions, retrieved from Scopus, Web of Science, Agricola, and CAB Abstracts. Findings indicate that veterinarians in intensive pig farming are increasingly positioned as strategic partners in herd health management. Their influence depends not only on technical expertise but also on trust, embeddedness in local practice, and their role in enabling ongoing learning in complex farm environments. However, tensions persist. Farmers may turn to peer networks over professional advice in times of stress, especially under economic pressure, and divergent views and priorities concerning animal health management, welfare, and antimicrobial use can complicate interaction. Structural pressures-such as short-term economic incentives, market constraints, and the dual commercial-regulatory role of veterinarians- further limit joint decision-making capacity. Although zoonotic risk and antimicrobial resistance dominate macro-level policy discourse, these concerns did not emerge as central themes in the empirical literature on everyday farmer-veterinarian interaction. By adopting a multi-level lens, this review exposes the layered complexity of human-animal health governance in industrial livestock systems. The synthesis offers a systems-aware perspective on how contextually situated relationships shape management behaviours, health and biosecurity outcomes. These insights support more effective policy design and cross-sectoral collaboration at the livestock-public health interface for resilient livestock farming.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.