Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42004728›Full record

ArticleHuman reproduction open2026

IVF in endometriosis: emerging evidence of exacerbation of pelvic pain and potential predictors.

Jonas Vibert, Eliane Maalouf, Jean-Marie Wenger, Antonio Mercorio, Giuseppe Benagiano, Nicola Pluchino

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human reproduction open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jonas VibertDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2449-7734
Eliane MaaloufInformation Management Institute, University of Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1549-7948
Jean-Marie WengerFaculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7730-5677
Antonio MercorioAssisted Reproductive Technology Unit, Department of Gynecology, Hôpital Foch, Suresnes, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2113-7706
Giuseppe BenagianoGeneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3168-4594
Nicola PluchinoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7475-9082

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

study questionDoes IVF worsen pelvic pain in women with endometriosis? SUMMARY ANSWER: Nearly half of women with endometriosis reported perceived worsening of pelvic pain after IVF. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Prior studies generally suggested no IVF-related pain worsening, but few assessed delayed flares or longer-term trajectories. STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION: International cross-sectional study based on an online survey conducted between September 2024 and April 2025 including 546 respondents. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING

methodsWomen aged ≥18 years with surgically or imaging-confirmed endometriosis and at least one completed IVF cycle. A 25-item questionnaire captured demographics, reproductive history, comorbidities, and patient-reported pain trajectories before, during, and after IVF. The primary outcome was perceived worsening of pelvic pain after IVF (patient-reported outcome measure; PROM). Secondary outcomes were worsening of dysmenorrhoea and dyspareunia. Group comparisons and exploratory multivariable logistic regressions were performed. Predictor analyses were exploratory. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Among 546 respondents, 48.9% reported worsening pelvic pain after IVF, 49.1% reported worsening dysmenorrhoea, and 35.5% worsening dyspareunia. Current pain scores were significantly higher in women reporting worsening versus no worsening (all LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: Self-reported, retrospective data are prone to recall and selection bias, and the cross-sectional design precludes causal inference. Recruitment via associations and social media without a denominator limits generalizability, absence of baseline pain scores impedes assessment of change, and incomplete capture of peri-IVF hormonal regimens may confound results. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE

findingsIVF may not be pain-neutral in endometriosis. Monitoring pain trajectories at key IVF milestones may help identify women at risk of long-term exacerbation. Prospective studies should test whether early monitoring combined with tailored interventions-optimized analgesia, psychological support, or adapted stimulation protocols-can mitigate chronic pain trajectories throughout the IVF journey and ultimately improve quality of life. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: No specific funding; authors declare no conflicts of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Indexed as

assisteddysmenorrhoeadyspareuniaendometriosisIVFpain measurementpatient-reported outcome measurespelvic painreproductive techniques

Identifiers

PMID42004728
PMCPMC13091650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.