Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42004715›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2026

Body reconstruction and size estimation of plesiosaurs.

Ruizhe Jackevan Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ruizhe Jackevan ZhaoDepartment of Mathematics, Northwest University, Xi'an, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Plesiosaurs were a clade of Mesozoic aquatic reptiles exhibiting high diversity in neck length. Although their body sizes have long attracted scientific and public attention, mass estimates grounded in rigorous skeletal reconstructions are notably lacking. Existing data often rely on historical museum mounts or outdated illustrations from old literature, casting doubt on their reliability. The body masses of many species also remain unknown to date. Methods: To bridge this knowledge gap, the present study employs a hybrid paradigm: (1) establish a standardized protocol for accurate skeletal reconstruction of plesiosaurs, with particular emphasis on deriving ribcage morphology from dorsal rib orientation; (2) uniformly apply this protocol to build multiple plesiosaur models spanning multiple clades, whose body masses are estimated using the cross-sectional method, a recently developed volumetric-density approach for mass estimation; and (3) identify reliable skeletal mass proxies by means of regression analysis. Regression models were also employed to estimate the dimensions of unpreserved skeletal elements. Model fit and predictive accuracy were assessed using sample-size corrected Akaike Information Criterion values and per cent prediction errors, respectively. Results: Rigorous body reconstructions were developed for 27 taxa covering all major plesiosaur clades, with body mass estimates ranging from 79 kg to 12,824 kg. This range sufficiently captures the size diversity seen across most plesiosaurs. These reconstructions were used to evaluate the performance of various skeletal elements as body size proxies. Among the tested metrics, trunk length and the mean volume of dorsal vertebral centrum were identified as the most robust predictors of plesiosaur body mass. Discussion: Critiques of the hybrid approaches often focus on inconsistent modeling criteria and limited taxonomic sampling. The present framework seeks to mitigate these concerns through uniform reconstruction standards applied across multiple plesiosaur clades. Potential uncertainties in soft-tissue restoration and limitations of the mass equations are explicitly addressed. By providing both rigorous skeletal reconstructions and practical mass-estimation tools, this work narrows the knowledge gap regarding the body masses of Mesozoic aquatic reptiles, and facilitates subsequent biomechanical and macroevolutionary studies on plesiosaurs.

Indexed as

Body SizeFossilsReptilesAnimalsRibsBiological scalingBody massBody size estimationCross-sectional methodMarine reptilesPlesiosaursRegressionRibcage restorationSkeletal reconstructionVolumetric-density

Identifiers

PMID42004715
PMCPMC13089226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.